Liane Lefaivre: Je voulais te demander ton avis a propos du pavillion francais. Et aussi du pavillion anglais. D’en faire la comparaison.
Jean-Francois Drevon: je suis retourné, dimanche au pavillon français. la baraque à frite était comble, encore une fois l’escalier était impraticable; difficile d’acceder au sommet quand on est pas ministre. Avec le petit embouteillage on aurait pu croire qu’il y avait foule. Bouchain nous avait pourtant promis “le pavillon sera une grande maison de la France, dans laquelle nous pourrons accueillir, offrir le gîte et le couvert et tranmettre.”
Or c’était payant et la transmission se limitait à la projection des projets de PB. Cela fait la troisième fois fois que la France inonde la lagune d’un flôt de discours sans acte : les vaporrettos littéraires de Nouvel ont pris l’eau et le sommet de Kyoto de Jourda était en carton. Alors je suis allé en face, au pavillon de l’Allemagne. On pouvait facilement se rendre sur une large terrasse, perchée sur le toit, pour admirer les alpes. Le pavillon anglais: il s’agissait aussi d’activisme de salon? décidemment Venise est un joli village…
Liane Lefaivre interviews Jean Francois Drevon, rédacteur en chef, AMC - Le Moniteur Architecture
September 27th, 2006The Dark Side
September 25th, 2006In addition to the immediacy of this Superblog - which is a fantastic idea - I thought The Architectural Review, Urban Splash, and White Partners Dark Side discussions (see image) held at the Palazzo Contarini was a fantastic idea. It brought together architects-to young to be included in the biennale- late every evening (from 11:00-1:00) to present new work and hear from a group of distinguished jury of peers. The hosts Robert White and Paul Finch were able to tie these projects into a larger discussion of Cities, Architecture and Society. It engaged a wide array of disparate but critical voices – exactly what was missing from the official positions on view at the Arsenale.
Promises and Lies
September 25th, 2006Odile, bless her, spoke for many when she wondered what had happened to architecture this year. But a break, however brief, from starchitecture was welcome nonetheless, no? The bits of this Biennale that stick in the mind are the promises and the lies (is that too harsh?). France was the initial standout but on the first Monday, after the opening, the stairs of their house were barred… It was like nobody was at home or worse, nobody was welcome anymore. They were on one side of the do-not-pass-the-crime-scene tape, we were on the other. I’ll be back in November and, hopefully, we’ll all be ‘chez France’ again. If it was just that the mosquitoes were getting to them, like they were to me, I’ll understand…
So it’s the oddities, the radicals, that linger most. The nobel, proud, shocking confrontation of the barrios of Venezuela: no help needed, thank you! Russia, with its flooded, barrell-organ city that rains nuclear fallout (or fishfood?) rather than Disney’s snow… and the tiny, poignant glimpse of the lagoon that became a panorama in the cardboard model cell that fronted it. Japan, sensual as you want, breath-taking and tactile (they’ll sell you gorgeous, bagged samples of bamboo, rope made from rice straw and charred cedar with the exhibition catalogues but don’t get caught touching the real thing!). That crazy Korean cartoon about death, burial and living forever through starburst cell phone messages… The RCA’s joyous, riotous London, MIT’s ecstatic, Big Brother Rome and C Magazine’s amazing photographs. And two long, unforgiving walks to the end of the line: Greece’s subtle and confounding intelligence about the archipelago and the poetry of China’s roof-tile square, an unforgettable rumination on the effects of modernisation, both rewarded every footstep and more.
But it is the paradigm shift represented by the Arsenale that is ultimately important. The most telling observation of all was by Christopher Hawthorne in the LA Times, reflecting on the denoument in New York that had Lords Foster and Rogers traversing the Atlantic from Venice to New York and back again during Vernissage: “After a decade in which architects and their clients grew obsessed with image ˜ as digital technology made the stunning two-dimensional rendering as powerful a force in the field as any completed building ˜ the shift is overdue. After all, the lessons seem all too clear at the World Trade Center site, where the participation of the world’s top architects failed to budge developer Larry Silverstein or Port Authority bureaucrats even an inch from entrenched positions. The rebuilding process there ought to be primarily remembered, at least in architecture, as a place where image took on power and was soundly routed.” Hmmm.
From an insular viewpoint: shocked to find Dublin described by our neighbours in the Padiglione Italia as a “shrinking city” (apparently the definition of shrinking cities is a hot topic for discussion in Germany, too, especially in Halle - and is gleefully exploited by the officials of Hamburg, among others) in the year that Ireland’s population reached its highest since 1861 and the capital’s inner city population increased dramatically, largely through immigration; but absolutely terrified by the implications of the European rail-v-air travel share over the next generation as set out in the Arsenale in Ricky’s Europe of Regions (2025) v Europe of Cities (2005) exhibit. In my mind, it moves heneghan.peng.architects’ proposal for a rail link between Ireland and Wales to Ireland’s top-of-the-survival charts. Ireland’s exhibit will come home in the New Year, the basis for a series of national discussions and debates. In an election year and with population growth over the next generation projected at up to 38%, you might say it’s gotta be shit or bust.
The Worst Pavilions
September 25th, 2006Switzerland : I didn’t get the humour in it, if there was any.
France : for its affordable “hedonism” and nothing more (le pur plaisir de ne rien inventer).
Finland : one of the nicest pavilions, with well presented (even not too bad) projects. A fatal combination of good potential + irrelevant result.
There are, sadly some even worse pavilions.
With the exception of a few remarkable shows at the Padiglione Italia (Italian Pavilion), I wasn’t thrilled by the Biennale. The generous amount of colourful visuals, playful devices, sculptural rooftops, little huts and pretension has quickly driven me into a state of bored architectural disgust. Maybe it’s just the indigestion effect.
We are all aware of how difficult it is to show architecture but this is not a reason for tiring the visitor with the display of excessive and often meaningless gesticulations or boring him with selections of domestic projects of poor theoretical interest, in an attempt at sobriety.
The anachronistic concept of a national pavilion would become more exciting if transformed in a space/place for hosting trans-national views, experiences and projects.
I was not shocked by the absence of Architecture, but disappointed by the absence of intelligence and by the reluctance of many to keep to the theme, despite its undeniable interest. Some urgent, fundamental questions were raised; I do hope we’ll try to answer them.




















