Archive for the ‘Gemma Tipton’ Category

Politics and Prejudices

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006

I brought politics with me to the Biennale, and so shouldn’t have been surprised to find them there. Of course there’s always going to be an element of Nationalism, or of self-promotion from some countries – it’s inherent in the structure of pavilions, all competing for attention, column inches, and a crowd at their openings. Some countries transcended this – Hungary, for example, wittily explored an issue that Europe and the US urgently need to address, the often-ignored influence, through immigration and commerce, of East Asian culture; meanwhile South Africa had tourist brochures available, belying the impact of some of their exhibition with glossy testaments to the country’s achievements.

You could see the relative successes of the publicity games over the opening weekend in the bags on people’s shoulders. Rotterdam 2007 was a big hit, and so were Denmark and Great Britain. And even after all the other shoulder bags had been handed out, Israel couldn’t have given them away. I wasn’t anxious for an Israeli bag, even before I had seen the content of their pavilion, but it was to the United States pavilion that I brought my real prejudices.

I walked around Building on Higher Ground crossly. Asking myself with what hypocrisy could the US present responses to the devastation wreaked by Hurricane Katrina, when the actual response had been so negligent? Where were the panels addressing the displaced poor? Where were the admissions that the Government had ‘messed up’? And it was only later, after I had visited, been engrossed in, and generally applauded the presentations in the Irish pavilion that I realised how unfair I was being. SubUrban to SuperRural showed the responses of nine Irish architectural practices to Ireland’s growing urban and suburban sprawl. Some of the presentations were sensible, some fantastical, some extremely clever and some thought-provoking. So where was my sense of disgust at the Irish Government? Their historical corruption, which has led to a blighted countryside, and appalling problems for suburban commuter families, is currently being investigated by a Tribunal of Enquiry. While government support is generally necessary to bring an exhibition to the Biennale, I have to remember to try to look at the ideas in the presentation, not the politics of the country. In this, of course, Israel failed on both counts.

‘Starchitects’ travel the world, bringing their visions and solutions across the divisions that the national boundaries (exemplified by the pavilions) create. Commerce also transcends national boundaries, and it seemed to me as I thought about how unfair I was being to the US, that as national political influence loses ground to international trends and multinational finance, political Nationalism grows ever stronger.

As a separate conclusion, I was also struck (yet again) by the misleading (and sometimes downright mendacious) exhibition strategies architects and developers employ. The worst and most brutally disproportionate towers and buildings are usually modelled in gleaming (and sometimes illuminated) perspex. The word ‘podium’ conjures bandstands, but usually means a cement block with a car park underneath. The skies are always blue and nothing is ever ever dirty. This thought came to me in Singapore (the pavilion, not the country), and again while flicking through the Arup book that was handed out to people drunkenly leaving the party at the Gaggiandre. Pages and pages of images of beautiful meadows and blissfully peaceful wildlife seemed rather incompatible with the development the book was intending to promote. Perhaps I’m being unfair, I can’t check back as the book was too much to carry home, along with lots of other bits of paper and books (so many also from pavilions promoting ’sustainability’) that I left it behind in my hotel.

DANCING ARCHITECTS

Saturday, September 9th, 2006

The Superblog had the best bellinis. The ones in the Danieli (courtesy of the Americans) weren’t nearly as good. After two days, these rather obnoxious distinctions start to make a sort of sense. With 49 countries launching their pavillions and exhibitions for the press, their colleagues and some intrigued passers-by, you start to develop an internal categorisation. ‘I should make it to the British Pavilion because the Long Blondes are playing’, starts to make better sense to you than ‘Latvia looks interesting’ (which it did). Rumours go around: Iceland are flying in a chef, and then you decide over gravad laxs that champagne at ten might work after all. There are the inevitable culture clashes; Russia and Ireland are both on at four, so which do you choose?

Ireland, of course, and so did Ricky Burdett, who said the group presentation by nine Irish practices was one of the best explorations of Cities Architecture and Society he had seen. Afterwards we went to the Gabrielli for more bellinis (not as good as the Superblog’s, probably on a par with the Americans..).

At this stage, what is on view becomes a blur. Belgium stands out for colour and kinetics, the French have everyone talking by living on the top of their Pavililon in a sort of Big-Brother-in-the-Giardini kind of a way. But what about architecture? What about the deeper themes? Perhaps that doesn’t matter so much, after all the Pavillions will remain open for weeks after these frantic days

have passed, and for looking at architecture, whether it is by means of models, diagrams, photographs, installations or video - what is really needed is alittle space and time, and an interested friend or colleague to talk things over with afterwards. No, the opening days of the Biennale are about meeting and greeting, connecting, and a fair amount of national showing off.

It’s also about seeing architects away from their natural habitats. Some adapt better than others. At the Danieli, where air conditioning seemed a distant, American and maybe rather suspect concept, it was sweltering. The Danieli’s ballroom (Marco Polo B, I seem to remember) would have been incredibly chic when it was first built, sometime in the seventies I suspect, although it could easily have been ten years earlier. Now it is a hot tired space, like many of its inhabitants that evening. Slowly melting, alongside equally slow cocktail-making, the women fared better than the men, who didn’t seem to have got to grips with the idea of taking heavy suit jackets off in murderous heat.

The worst sufferer seemed to be a young man who had accessorised with a silk scarf, tied cravat-style, dramatic white shirt, black jacket and plenty of sweat. Zaha Hadid was leaving as I arrived, I would say she looked cool and elegant in an appropriate ensemble, but that would put this blog on a level with those of the papparazzi who were outside, waiting for a glimpse of Posh and Beckham, in Venice for Something to do with Gucci, and which is, oddly enough, something I find extremely tempting.

Last night the Americans didn’t serve Bellinis, instead it was wine at the Guggenheim in a lovely garden party where we ate deep fried sage leaves, and were eaten in turn by mosquitoes. And then to the Gaggiandre, where an interesting door policy meant some were admitted to a supply of endless proseccos, and (ultimately) a line of conga-dancing architects, while others went to meander back through the streets of Venice. On my own meanderings at around 4 am, I found scattered architects, squinting at maps on different bridges. Venice is an architectural triumph, a man made city where nature is fighting back and geography always has the last laugh.

So highlights?

Bellinis at the Superblog (Harry’s Dolce)
The Icelandic Breakfast
The Four Long Blondes and dirty great bottles of beer at the British Pavilion
Deep fried sage leaves at the Guggenheim
Seemingly-endless prosecco and cakes presented in architectural boxes at the Gaggiandre

And now it’s time for the architecture.